![]() You really can't go wrong and if you can't test them out, buying one to test and selling it for the other system probably won't lose you much if any money. They also have a ton of accessories and you can really customize them to your shooting style. The shape isn't the best though, it's kind of like shooting with a shoebox.īoth have a wide array of great lenses so I wouldn't say one is better than the other there and both will probably function for a long time with proper maintenance and care. The 1/400th shutter speed can limit a little, but ND filters and slow speed film can be an easy work around. The removable backs can also be a plus if you find yourself wanting to shoot a bunch of different film stocks or formats. It can flash sync at all speeds since it has leaf shutter lenses, has the rotating back so you don't have to hold the camera different when going from landscape to portrait, is probably easier to focus with the built in magnifier (YMMV) and bellows focusing allows you to get very close to your subject without dedicated macro lenses or extension tubes. The RB/RZ is a much better studio camera. The flash sync is extremely slow though, the 105 has a pretty far close focus distance as does the 165 leaf shutter lens and it's not the easiest camera to focus with, especially indoors with a modeling light or dimly lit studio. I personally find it the more ergonomic of of the two. You have 1/1000 shutter speed which is nice when shooting in brighter conditions. It genuinely feels like a giant 35mm SLR, especially with one of those 3D printed grips. The Pentax I think is a better camera to take out in the field and shoot landscapes and faster paced stuff. If you're passionate about taking your photography to the next level but aren't sure where to dive in, check out the Well-Rounded Photographer tutorial where you can learn eight different genres of photography in one place. If you purchase it now, or any of our other tutorials, you can save a 15% by using " ARTICLE" at checkout.What do you shoot more? Flash, close up portraits, landscapes, etc? While both are capable of accomplishing any job you need, they each have their strengths and weaknesses. That said, some of my most favorite photographs I've ever taken were with these cameras.ĭo you have any experience with the Mamiya RB67? What about the RZ67? What are you thoughts on the cameras? Though the RZ is generally newer and a bit lighter with lighter and smaller lenses, they are both quite heavy and a bit cumbersome to travel with. The Mamiya RB67 Professional was first released in 1970, and most sources state that the Mamiya RB67 was originally designed to complement and extend the Mamiya C-Series TLR (twin-lens reflex) camera range, and their very specific methods of use, as well as classic 6×6 image size. You get 10 wonderful film images from some of the most unique and beautiful lenses ever made. These two cameras are all around winners in every way for film. Outfitted with the 90mm lens and the waist level finder, you have my favorite film camera I own.Īs you may know, I own and have reviewed the Mamiya RB67 as well as its sibling, the Mamiya RZ67. Indeed, owning one has almost become a right of passage for the modern film photographer. ![]() ![]() ![]() For many film photographers, the Mamiya RB67 was their first medium format film camera. In this video, Kyle McDougall walks us through his long term review of his Pro-SD version of the Mamiya RB67 film camera. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |